Showing posts with label Historical Epistemology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Historical Epistemology. Show all posts

Monday

Que la biblioteca hable del hombre


The Great Ocean of Knowledge. 
The Influence of Travel Literature on the Work of John Locke
by Ann Talbot
Leiden/Boston: Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History vol. 184, 2010

Reviewed by María G. Navarro

The resercher Ann Talbot presents in this book one of the more complex and in-depth studies ever written about the influence of travel literature on the work of the British philospher John Locke (1632-1704).
At the end of the 18th century the study of travel literature was an alternative to academic studies. The philosopher John Locke recommended with enthousiasm these books as a way to comprehend human understanding. Several members of the Royal Society like John Harris (1966-1719) affirmed that the learning that could be obtained through these books was different from the one that provided the educative system of that time. Travel literature could make see the source of the ignorance of the ancients; it stressed the curiosities and extraordinary facts and led to a revision of beliefs and scientific theories of the ancient world. Besides the account of a broad diversity of sujects contributed to the creation of matters of fact, and this was important in order to put rational limits to the descriptions of the world that were commonly accepted.
The book The Great Ocean of Knowledge. The Influence of Travel Literature on the Work of John Locke is an exhaustive and rigourous study of Locke’s thought. It shows a deep knowledge of postmodern critiques to the modern notion of Enlightment and applies these historiographical critiques to a documented analysis of Locke’s library and what could mean, for him, the travel literature he read. These are some of the most important contributions of a book that is a historiographical research work on travel literature and its intelectual effects; it sets a specific model in order to analyse the genesis of Locke’s thought and, besides, offers a critical and contemporary study of the significance of European Enlightment. These aspects, that are to be associated to the character of the research carried out by Talbot and also to her intellectual disposal, have to do with the two questions the book answers to: what kind of works were in Locke’s library?, how is to be evaluated the impact of travel books on the philosopher’s thought?
In a library of more that 3600 books, 269 works could be classified today as philosophy and 275 as travel or geography. This significant proportion is forwarded as an evidence of Locke’s interest for this kind of literature. But, what did he thought about this material? What did it mean to him?
First, Talbot raises these questions and analyses them as an historian. Aftewards she does it as a critique of the historiographical conceptions of modernity about the origins of Enlightment. And finally, she analyses them as an expert in the political and moral thought of Locke.
The result is a reference work about the thought of Locke, but also about the history of the ideas of Enlightment and about research models of historiography to deal with all this, and to present it. That is why, in my opinion, this book is an innovative work in all the three above mentionned fields.
Two important factors influenced Locke. In the first place, the absolutist society he lived in, a society where the learning model was based on the study of the classics and of the Bible. In the second place, his knowledge of the research techniques he learned of two authors influenced by Bacon, Robert Boyle and Thomas Sydenhan. Locke used what he had learned from them in a unique way to examine contemporary questions on politics, human behaviour, beliefs and religion.
The 275 works of travel literature in Locke’s library are classified by Talbot into four categories: books related to projects of the fellows of the Royal Society, clearly linked to baconian tradition; works influence by the Neo-Thomist School of Salamanca, in Spain; books that linked Confucianism to atheism and materialism and, finally, travel books that had an utopian character. The author analyses the influence of each of these works of travel literature on the theory of knowledge of Locke, and also on his political and moral philosophy.
Locke’s library was comparable to those of other fellows of the Royal Society, but the impact of this literature on his work was unique and non comparable to any other case. It seems that Locke selected his books paciently, in the same way a doctor looks for indexes, signales, evidence, exceptional and challenging cases for himself and his theories. His bibliographic quest, similar to the one of a collector, was filled with true scientific and philosophical passion, as he saw each travel book as an opportunity to evaluate and check what he had proposed in his own work.
The problem of what laws do govern human behaviour, the variations between one society and another, questions that have to do with the problem of the universality of moral or the origin of human knowledge, can no longer be understood without the image of this library rich in travel literature, where Locke spent most of his life reading and writing, chewing, ruminating all these stories of extraordinary places and people.
The question of human nature transforms itself into a fascinating philosophical investigation thanks to Talbot’s book, and it is so for two reasons: it helps us to approach the figure of John Locke and the philosophical and political meaning of Enlightment, and it does it without breaking its relationship with the experiency of the discovery of other human beings and unknown places. A radical experience both for Europeans and for its ‘others’ that was made possible by Enlightment by means of travel literature.
The book is structured in fourteen chapters and a conclusion to which two appendices are added. In them, the author offers a list of the travel books cited by Locke, and a complete bibliography of the manuscript sources.
In my opinion, the work of Talbot offers an interpretation of the thought of Locke made from the point of view of social anthropology.

Tuesday

La expresión de la inteligencia humana: historia cultural de una capacidad


A History of Intelligence and “Intellectual Disability”. The Shaping of Psychology in Early Modern Europe
by C.F. Goodey
UK/USA: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2011

Reviewed by María G. Navarro

A History of Intelligence and “Intellectual Disability” examines how the concepts of intellectual ability and disability became part of psychology, medicine and biology. Focusing on the period between the Protestant Reform and 1700, this book shows that in many cases it has been accepted without scientific and psychological foundations that intelligence and disability describe natural or trans-historical realities.
The author, C.F. Goodey, has been investigating on the history of intellectual disability for more than 20 years. He has developed his research and teaching at Ruskin College, Oxford, the Open University and the University of London among others. Goodey has a strong hypothesis with a clear theoretical potential. He makes his research following historical conditions, accepting temporal restrictions and analysing concepts from a semantic point of view (in different fields as for example the psychology, biology, medicine and even philosophy of the mentioned period). Consequence of this research is not only a critique of the presumptive natural signification of intelligence and disability but a new approach with educative, political, social and psychological implications. He demonstrates that the topic he presents to debate and public critical thinking is in truth related to the social origins of human self-representation. It is in this sense how we should understand the current debates on intelligence.
Other important argument is that intellectual disability is a notion developed through dilemmas around predestination and free-will in Protestant theology. However, it is important to not forget that this diagnostic is not equivalent to the author’s claim to regard intelligence and intellectual disability as historical contingences.
The book is well-structured. Having in mind that the author has accepted certain historical reconstructions focusing his attention on the political, social, psychological and even medical and educative dimensions of the concepts he presents to analyse, we can say that the book is extremely serious in his general plan. Limitations and contradictions of a historical genealogy of intelligence and disability as natural or trans-historical realities will permit the author to test his hypothesis about the radical contingency of our dreams about human intelligence and the particular nightmare of this dream is its absence.
Divided in eight parts A History of Intelligence and “Intellectual Disability”, has the subtitle The Shaping of Psychology in Early Modern Europe, the theoretical hypothesis and the historical framework are constituted by eighteen chapters in which the notion of disability is presented as part of socio-economic structures, medical histories, status and forms of power and even as phenomenon that implores a kind of ethics of exceptionality. This history of intelligence and intellectual disability shows in its passionate eighteen chapters that the very salient and notable history of human self-representation is also a history of exclusion and dishonour for testing the rule of human nature through classification and abnormality.
Goodey presents in this work the notion of intellectual disability as a product of certain historical idiosyncrasies as the very important demand from a marketized bureaucracy that each of us answers to individually. To be more precise, the author affirms that “the microcosm-macrocosm picture of man’s place in the universe, a central feature of medieval cosmology, has been transformed in the modern era into a picture where the horizontal axis of time replaces the vertical one of space, and a future godlike human intelligence replaces God himself as its point of aspiration.” (p.39) But the gravity of this assertion is accompanied by long-term, cross-cultural elements: Goodey presents a complex map since the ancient Greeks to the history of intelligence and disability in European socio-economic structures, the important religious texts that present intelligence (also called ‘wit’) as a self-referential mode of bidding status and conduct manuals in which it is clear how honour, grace as related to intelligence occupied a juxtaposes place with the corresponding concept of disability, etc.
The definitions of these notions are important because they are part of the history of medicine: following this theoretical frame doctors have written descriptions of intellectual states and their relationship to the structure of body and brain. The last chapter describes the influence of this strong sixteenth and seventeenth discourse on the philosopher John Locke in his comments on ‘idiots’ and ‘changelings’. As we know the idiot was for Locke not a changeling as the idiot lacked the fundamentally human capability to abstract. Goodey also analyses the influence of Locke’s doctrine on the eighteenth-century theories of behaviour and modern educational practices: “Locke replaces an organic, behavioural and provisional model of foolishness with one that is disembodied, intellectual, and permanent” (p.326).
Researchers and scholars interested in studying intelligence and of lack-of-intelligence in periods before the 20th century will find in this book one of the most relevant work.
But as intelligence is a peculiar idea maybe many researchers will continue asking why our modern understanding of intellectual disability, a contingent and accidental notion, crystallised around 400 years ago and what that implies for us in our current century not only in Western but in the whole world. I am sure it will continue to be contingent and accidental but in what sense and what kind of humans beings are currently classified by these notions? Is also animal’s intelligence part of the scenery about the lack-of-intelligence we should analyse? How Goodey´s thesis about the contingent and accidental definition of disability, intelligence and lack-of-intelligence affects our new and future conceptions of human self-representation and animal representation? Reading this book will give you some answers but it will also increase the number of questions.